Pride Month takes its timing from the United States. The Stonewall uprising in June 1969 became the basis for an almost-global calendar. Although the cause spread quickly, the history did not. Many Commonwealth countries had already begun dismantling their inherited criminal laws before Stonewall, and others have moved further and faster since. The spread of Stonewall as the common narrative is itself a form of cultural dominance, mirroring how earlier British laws spread across the Commonwealth and still shape homophobia today.
Artwork by CoPilot AI
Across the Commonwealth, the picture is old and uneven. The laws that still shape queer life in dozens of member states were written in London and exported outward as part of the administrative machinery of what was then a racist, sexist and homophobic empire. Their origins are detailed by the Human Dignity Trust and legal historians tracing the reach of the 1533 Buggery Act and the Indian Penal Code Section 377. Pride Month, seen from here, is not a celebration of a single uprising but a reminder of the afterlife of that empire: what was imposed, and what each country has chosen to keep.
Colonial Origins
The legal architecture that still shapes queer life across much of the Commonwealth did not originate in the countries that enforce it. It was built in Britain, refined through Victorian anxieties, and exported outward through empire. The 1860 code created the category of “carnal intercourse against the order of nature,” a phrase that travelled across Asia, Africa, and the Caribbean. A further Victorian offence (“gross indecency”) was broad enough to criminalise letters, gestures, or implication.
Art by CoPilot AI
The British Empire spread these statutes around the world. They were imposed on societies with their own histories of gender and intimacy. Pre‑colonial records across Africa and Asia show diverse understandings of gender and sexuality, documented by ILGA World. The downfall of the Empire and eventual independence of its colonies did not undo the damage. Many emerging nations kept the inherited codes because they were already embedded in courts, policing, and legal ethics.
Diverse Commonwealth Paths
United Kingdom. The UK exported the criminal codes that shaped the Commonwealth, then dismantled them at home: partial decriminalisation in 1967, followed by Scotland (1980) and Northern Ireland (1982).
Australia. Australia inherited British criminal law and enforced it harshly. Decriminalisation occurred state by state from 1975 to 1997, summarised by the Digital Classroom. Marriage equality arrived in 2017.
Uganda. Uganda shows how inherited colonial laws can be intensified rather than dismantled. The Victorian “unnatural offences” provisions became the platform for successive legislation, culminating in the far harsher 2023 Anti‑Homosexuality Act, encouraged by religious influences in the UK and the USA.
Some other Commonwealth members exhibit more hope. Botswana’s courts dismantled colonial statutes through constitutional reasoning in 2019 and 2021 (High Court; Court of Appeal), while Dominica’s High Court struck down its colonial‑era provisions in April 2024 (Dominica ruling).
Activism and the Tradition Defence
Trinidad Jerry, a young LGBTQ refugee killed in Kakuma Refugee Camp in Kenya, lived and died under a legal environment shaped by colonial statutes and contemporary hostility. Four years later, Emanuel Muhayimana was killed in the same camp, underscoring how little had changed.
Art by CoPilot AI
Legal reform across the Commonwealth has been driven less by parliaments than by activists, lawyers, and community groups working through the courts. In India, the petitioners in Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India argued that Section 377 violated Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Constitution. In the Caribbean, cases were brought by citizens who lived under the laws.
The work has also been carried by individuals whose names rarely appear in political speeches but whose risks have reshaped the legal landscape. Caleb Orozco in Belize, Jason Jones in Trinidad and Tobago, and Rosanna Flamer‑Caldera in Sri Lanka challenged the laws in their own courts. In Uganda, David Kato’s advocacy — and his murder in 2011 — exposed the dangers faced by those who confront inherited statutes; Frank Mugisha continues that work under constant pressure. In the United Kingdom, Peter Tatchell’s long‑running campaigns helped expose the colonial origin of the laws Britain exported.
Courts in Belize, Trinidad and Tobago, Botswana, and Dominica have all stated explicitly that the criminal provisions were imposed by colonial authorities and do not reflect indigenous culture. Dominica’s 2024 ruling noted that the Sexual Offences Act provisions were “inherited from a colonial legal framework,” as highlighted by the Human Dignity Trust.
Leaders in Uganda, Nigeria, and Ghana often frame criminalisation as cultural defence and LGBTQ identities as foreign. This reverses the historical reality: the criminal laws were imported by Britain, while the constitutional rights used to dismantle them are home‑grown. A recent cross‑continental study on women’s rights in Africa found the same pattern: governments defending “traditional African values” while enforcing legal frameworks inherited from external colonial rule.
The Road Ahead
Art by CoPilot AI
Next likely reformers. Sri Lanka has signalled willingness to amend Sections 365 and 365A. Mauritius has active litigation. Namibia — not a Commonwealth member but a parallel post‑colonial jurisdiction — struck down its sodomy laws in 2024.
High‑risk states. Uganda’s 2023 Act remains the most severe example. Ghana’s proposed “Family Values” bill threatens to expand criminalisation. Nigeria continues to enforce the 2014 Same‑Sex Marriage (Prohibition) Act.
Courts will continue to lead. In most jurisdictions, the next major reforms will come through litigation rather than legislation.
Activism and visibility. Legal reform follows visibility, community organising, and sustained advocacy. These movements are local, not imported.
Geopolitics. Some states use decriminalisation to alignm with democratic partners; others use criminalisation to align with conservative blocs.
The work continues.
Across the Commonwealth, legal change has come from citizens who challenged the laws that governed their lives; people stepping up when politicians often fear to tread. Their cases, risks, and losses form the quiet impetus beneath every reform.
Their footsteps fall where Commonwealth leaders frequently fail.
She didn’t choose to gather her children in the dark and run: from war, from persecution, from a government that wanted her family dead, from militias that burned villages, from bombs that fell on schools, from the kind of danger that makes a leaking boat in open water seem like the safer option.
She didn’t choose to have her children ostracised, attacked and forced to flee home and family because of their sexuality.
She didn’t choose years of living in limbo… in camps, in temporary shelters, in bureaucratic purgatory… while the UNHCR processes and defers, while her children grow up without permanence, without a future they can count on, without a place to call home, or a community to call village or family.
She didn’t choose to have her case ignored, delayed, or denied by nations that speak of compassion and practise indifference.
She didn’t choose to flee to countries in Europe or Australia, only to be met with suspicion, hostility, and hatred… told she is a burden, a threat, an inconvenience… by people who have never had to choose between danger and dignity.
She didn’t choose to live under the shadow of forced deportation: to watch governments like the current United States administration tear families apart and send people back to the very dangers they escaped, caring nothing for what awaits them there.
She didn’t choose to watch her children go hungry in refugee camps stripped of funding, camps where foreign aid was cancelled, where food ran out, where clean water became unavailable, where medicines disappeared, because powerful men in powerful countries decided her children’s lives were unimportant.
She didn’t choose any of this.
She chose only to fight against all odds to keep her children alive; to keep going when everything said stop.
She chose to love fiercely in conditions designed to break her.
On Mother’s Day, we celebrate the mothers we know and love. But let’s also hold space for the mothers we never see: the ones at the edges of our world, carrying the unbearable with grace we will never be asked to find.
For many refugees, displacement is already a story of loss, survival, and hope. But for LGBTQ refugees, it is often a story of double persecution — fleeing danger in their home countries only to face new threats in the very places meant to protect them.
I know this reality not from reports or headlines, but from lived experience.
In 2022, I was arrested in Kakuma Refugee Camp in Kenya alongside three other transgender women. Our only “crime” was existing openly as who we are. Life in the camp was marked by constant fear. Transphobic individuals targeted us regularly — through threats, harassment, and violence.
Despite reporting these incidents, our voices were often ignored within systems that were supposed to protect us.
We were told, directly and indirectly, to stay silent. But silence was never an option.
We chose to speak out, to organize, and to demand visibility. Our advocacy grew stronger, and so did the backlash. At one point, a Kenyan senator initiated a committee to investigate why LGBTQ refugees were in the camp. Instead of addressing the violence we faced, we were accused of “spreading homosexuality,” as if our existence was a threat.
Still, we refused to disappear.
Threats from the Senator in 2023 (photo supplied)
We organized a Pride event in the camp — a bold act of resilience and visibility. For a moment, it felt like we were reclaiming our dignity. But that moment was short-lived. Police officers arrived and dismantled our celebration, reinforcing the message that we were not welcome, even in spaces we tried to create for ourselves.
Months later, the situation escalated further. The camp manager issued a directive ordering all LGBTQ individuals to leave Kakuma or face arrest. When we requested legal documentation to leave safely, it was denied. Instead, arrests began.
We were trapped — told to leave, but denied the means to do so.
In a desperate search for safety, we made a difficult decision during a community meeting: to flee. South Sudan was the closest option, and despite the risks, we crossed the border hoping for protection.
But the challenges followed us.
Discrimination, insecurity, and lack of protection persisted.
Yet, even in the face of repeated hardship, we did not give up.
Through continued advocacy and the support of international allies, I was eventually relocated to Canada. Today, I live in safety — but my journey is far from over. My voice carries the stories of many who are still left behind.
In places like Gorom Refugee Camp in South Sudan, LGBTQ refugees continue to endure violence, exclusion, and neglect. They remain invisible in policies, unheard in systems, and unprotected in spaces meant to offer refuge. Many are still waiting for resettlement, for recognition, and for the basic dignity every human being deserves.
This is why I continue to speak out.
(Remembering LGBT+ refugees whose voice is often silenced)
International Priorities
Resettlement countries such as Canada should urgently prioritize LGBTQ refugees in refugee camps because they face layered and life-threatening vulnerabilities that go far beyond the general hardships of displacement. Unlike other refugee groups, LGBTQ individuals are often exposed to targeted violence, discrimination, and social exclusion both from within refugee communities and sometimes from local authorities, leaving them without meaningful protection or safe living conditions.
In many camps, there are limited or no specialized services such as safe housing, mental health support, protection mechanisms, or confidential reporting systems that address their specific needs. As a result, LGBTQ refugees are frequently forced to live in constant fear, isolation, and invisibility, where even accessing basic humanitarian assistance can expose them to further harm. Prioritizing their resettlement is therefore not about preference, but about protection of the most at-risk individuals within already vulnerable populations.
Countries like Canada, which have strong human rights commitments, have both the capacity and moral responsibility to ensure that LGBTQ refugees are given urgent pathways to safety, dignity, and long-term protection.
The international community must act urgently to protect LGBTQ refugees. This includes ensuring safe and inclusive asylum systems, addressing discrimination within refugee camps, and accelerating resettlement processes for those at risk.
Silence and inaction only deepen the suffering.
We are not asking for special treatment — we are asking for safety, dignity, and the right to exist.
Our resilience should not be mistaken for acceptance of injustice. We have endured, resisted, and survived. But survival is not enough.
It is time for the world to listen. It is time for change.
*Charity is an activist and refugee advocate who has previously written articles from Kakuma and Gorom.
Published on World Humanitarian Day — August 19, 2025. This year’s theme, “Strengthening Global Solidarity and Empowering Local Communities,” reminds us that dignity is not a luxury. It is a right. And it is under siege.
See also my previous blog post on PEPFAR for more details on this world crisis.
There’s no official death toll. Not yet. Not from the Trump administration’s cuts to foreign aid and PEPFAR (the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief) since January 22, 2025. But public health experts have begun to estimate the cost…
… approximately 2,472 lives lost every day.
These are not numbers — they are stolen futures. The dismantling of USAID and cancellation of 83% of global contracts has left 79 million people without the lifelines they were promised. It’s not just foreign assistance that has ceased — it’s the extinguishing of hope on a planetary scale.
Amidst the tsunami of darkness, there are small flickers of hope. For one: PEPFAR was nearly gutted – a $4B cut was written into the White House’s rescissions package — enough to shutter HIV clinics, halt treatment programs, and erase decades of progress. But advocacy worked. The HIV community mobilized. Lawmakers reversed course. On July 18, 2025, the President signed a revised bill with some PEPFAR cuts removed and $400 million restored.
This was not a victory. It was a warning – and a challenge for us all. We need to keep lighting more candles in the dark.
The Genocide Commences
Starting on the first day of his second term, President Trump issued several executive actions that have fundamentally changed foreign assistance. These included: an executive order which called for a 90-day review of foreign aid; a subsequent “stop-work order” that froze all payments and services for work already underway; the dissolution of USAID, including the reduction of most staff and contractors; and the cancellation of most foreign assistance awards. Although a waiver to allow life-saving humanitarian assistance was issued, it has been limited to certain services only and difficult for program implementers to obtain. In addition, while there have been several legal challenges to these actions, there has been limited legal remedy to date. As a result, U.S. global health programs have been disrupted and, in some cases, ended. – KFF, 10 June 2025
Prior to the Trump administration’s sudden and chaotic cuts, programs funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM) and the U.S. Department of Labor had delivered foreign assistance in 177 countries.
Local Consequences of Global Aid Cuts
Health Systems Crippled
In Mozambique, HIV prevention programs overseen by the Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Aids Foundation were defunded after false claims misattributed $50M in condom purchases to Hamas in Gaza (Palestine), ignoring the reality of AIDS work in Gaza Province, Mozambique.
In Cameroon, thousands lost access to antiretroviral therapy after U.S.-funded programs were shut down.
In Afghanistan, maternal care, TB treatment, and therapeutic feeding centers in provinces like Badakhshan and Kabul were suspended, forcing families to seek unaffordable private care.
In South Africa, the world’s largest HIV epidemic now faces reduced outreach and support for orphans and rape survivors.
In Syria, ambulance services and health clinics servicing 36,000 people in Al-Hol detention camp were among the first to be cut.
In Yemen, cholera treatment, malnutrition support, and shelters for survivors of gender-based violence were shut down.
Support for Survivors Erased
In Guatemala, programs aiding pregnant girls who survived rape lost funding, along with HIV services for women, girls, and LGBTI communities.
In South Sudan, rehabilitation, psychological support, and emergency nutrition for conflict and sexual violence survivors were terminated.
In Haiti, post-rape services and child nutrition programs were dismantled.
Food and Nutrition Lifelines Severed
In the Democratic Republic of Congo, war-ravaged families now survive on leaves and marketplace scraps; some are forced into sexual exploitation or child marriage for food.
In Nigeria, USAID’s closure in Dikwa ended food and medical aid for displaced families fleeing Boko Haram, including anti-malaria programs.
In Yemen, an Australian-run program serving 765,000 people — including 26,000 malnourished children — was cancelled.
Education and Protection Undermined
In Nepal, a girls’ education program was axed, increasing risks of child marriage and trafficking.
In Bangladesh, services for Rohingya refugees — water, sanitation, shelter — were suspended.
In Papua New Guinea, a peacebuilding initiative to reduce tribal violence was halted mid-launch, leaving communities without mediation support.
Environmental and Community Projects Lost
In Tanzania, the Jane Goodall Institute lost $30M in funding for its “Hope Through Action” program, disrupting reforestation, health services, and local governance.
Across Southeast Asia and the Pacific, Australian agencies lost over $224M AUD, forcing 20 office closures and hundreds of local staff layoffs.
According to a report by the Australian Council for International Development, over 120 Australian programs have been cut. Jessica Mackenzie, Director of Policy and Advocacy at the Australian Council for International Development (ACFID) told SBS News:
“400 million ((AUD)) worth of programming has been cut. 20 country offices have closed, and we’ve seen a number of staff laid off. Just one agency had to let go of 200 local staff, not even their own staff, and they would have been single income families. And so you can imagine the flow on effects of this.”
These programs were not accidental or random; they were part of a worldwide infrastructure of support and empowerment and dignity and a form of genuinely pro-life activism. We honour this past not by looking back in sorrow, but by looking forward with resolve. The tools of change still exist — if we choose to wield them. This work is not just history; it’s inheritance. What we do next will define who we are and what we leave behind.
Kindness not Killing
Before the Trump cuts, U.S. foreign aid had helped fund some of the world’s most cost-effective interventions: Malaria prevention, Nutrition programs and Health systems. These weren’t handouts — they were lifelines. They helped stabilize fragile regions, reduce disease burden, and build resilience against future shocks. The world must fight for a return to these aid levels and actions to improve humanity.
Even amidst the wreckage, the legacy of USAID and PEPFAR reminds us what coordinated global action can achieve. These programs didn’t just save lives — they built futures. And while many have been dismantled, the blueprint remains. It’s not too late to rebuild.
Trump’s cuts to aid funding have compelled the United Nations — which serves as a sort of middle agent for sending humanitarian aid to other groups — to focus on helping the neediest 100 million people in the world. That’s only roughly a third of the number of people who need assistance; 300 million people at the beginning of the year were considered in urgent need of humanitarian help. How can we return to better times for the others? The infrastructure may be dismantled, but the memory of what worked (and who it served) remains.
Compassion or Collapse?
Dr. Brooke Nichols, a global health economist and infectious disease modeler, has created a real-time tracker called Impact Counter to estimate excess deaths resulting from the near-total freeze in this humanitarian aid.
Nichols estimates that the freeze and cuts to USAID and PEPFAR cause roughly 103 preventable deaths every hour — about 2,472 per day — across HIV, tuberculosis and other diseases. If funding isn’t fully restored by the end of 2025, that translates into an estimated 176,000+ additional HIV deaths and 62,000+ TB deaths This equal 238,000 deaths that would not have occurred under previous funding levels.
As of today, estimates are that 141,167 adult deaths and 293,594 child deaths as a result of the cuts. Her team used disease-specific mortality models to track the fallout from the dismantling of U.S. foreign aid, including programs for HIV, tuberculosis, malaria, pneumonia, malnutrition, and diarrhoea.
Other media sites acknowledge this profound loss. Internal memos from USAID, reported by ProPublica, warned that up to 166,000 people could die from malaria, 200,000 children could be paralyzed by polio, and one million children might go untreated for severe malnutrition over the next decade if the cuts remained in place.
Nichols was asked when tangible evidence could start appearing to document the deaths:
“I think it’s different for each different disease. I think in terms of stockpiles, people usually have three months of supplies on hand. So that’s when you’d start to see it. Not from day one. But for some things like malnutrition, that could happen from as early as day one. Food supplies don’t last for three months. They last typically much less time.”
Meanwhile, HIV diagnoses are rising in Africa – and locals directly attribute this to the sudden unavailability of Pre Exposure Prophylaxis due to cuts by Trump and Musk.
Meanwhile, in Kenya alone, the World Food Programme (WFP) has reduced its food basket for more than 800,000 refugees to just 28% of a full ration – the lowest level ever recorded in Kenya. My friends in those camps (and in South Sudan) report starving kids, suffering families, threats of violence when police confront peaceful protesters – and they beg the world for help. Meanwhile, Trump’s administration permits the cuts and sociopathically destroys food aid over the heartfelt efforts of aid workers.
The catastrophe is rising. This is not like waiting for a war to start – the world is already at war. The media has largely ignored it – but this is potentially Ukraine or Yemen or Gaza on a planetary scale.
But we still have time to stop the worst of it.
World Responses
“We’re forced to cut assistance even for those facing starvation… That means people will die.”
— Carl Skau
Deputy Executive Director World Food Program
“This is not just a funding shortfall—it is a crisis of responsibility… Lives will be lost.”
— Filippo Grandi UN High Commissioner for Refugees
“Despite a limited waiver covering some activities, what our teams are seeing in many of the countries where we work is that people have already lost access to lifesaving care and have no idea whether or when their treatment will continue.”
— Avril Benoît
Chief executive officer of MSF USA
This human catastrophe transcends borders and barriers:
“We refuse to accept that any life is worth less than another.”
— PIH Mission Statement
“Ceasing almost all life-saving humanitarian, peacebuilding, health, and poverty-focused development assistance… is unconscionable and menacing, and inflicts harm on innocent people..”
— Joint letter from Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, and Buddhist groups FCNL Interfaith Letter
“The scale and suddenness of these current cuts have created a life-threatening vacuum that other governments and aid organizations are not realistically able to fill… violating the rights to life, health, and dignity for millions.”
— Amanda Klasing Amnesty International USA
“The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don’t do anything about it.”
— Albert Einstein.
Even amid widespread collapse, some lifelines quietly held. These stories don’t erase the devastation—but they remind us that humanitarian action still lives in the hands of those who refuse to give up.
Ethiopia’s First Aid Breakthrough
In May 2025, ShelterBox and PAD (Positive Action for Development) launched their first joint deployment to Ethiopia, delivering emergency response training to field staff in Shire, Tigray—a region still reeling from conflict and displacement.
Staff received basic first aid, personal security, and emergency simulation training for the first time.
“The sessions were not only informative but also very relevant to our context,” said one PAD team member, “Your team’s energy and professionalism made a lasting impression on all of us.”
This wasn’t just a workshop — it was a transfer of dignity, a moment where global solidarity met local resilience.
Kenya’s Refugee Integration Breakthrough: The Shirika Plan
In March 2025, Kenya accelerated the rollout of the Shirika Plan — transforming refugee camps into integrated municipalities.
Refugees now have access to national ID systems, healthcare, education, and work permits. The towns of Dadaab and Kakuma-Kalobeyei are being elevated to full municipalities, allowing refugees and host communities to co-develop infrastructure and services. The World Bank has pledged $215 million to support robust health services for over 2 million people in Turkana and Garissa districts.
This isn’t just policy — it’s a humanitarian reset, where displaced people are no longer warehoused but welcomed as contributors to civic life. Kenya just needs to ensure that all refugees – including its LGBT+ contingent – receive equal treatment.
These stories remind us that humanitarian action is not extinct; it’s endangered. The breakthroughs in Ethiopia and Kenya show what’s still possible when solidarity is funded, trusted, and allowed to flourish. But they are exceptions, not the rule.
For every town that rises, a hundred fall. For every training delivered, a thousand go without. The question isn’t whether hope exists — it’s whether we will choose to sustain it.
What We Choose Next
This is not just a humanitarian collapse. It is a test of our collective memory — and our moral imagination.
For those seeking proof that progress still lives — even amid collapse — Miriam English’s reflection on the International Day of Hope reminds us that humanity’s arc bends not only toward justice, but toward empathy, education, and renewal.
The dismantling of USAID and the near-erasure of PEPFAR were not inevitable. They were choices. And so too is what comes next.
We can choose to rebuild the lifelines that once held 79 million people above water. We can choose to amplify the voices of those still fighting — in refugee camps, in clinics, in classrooms, in forests. We can choose legacy over lethargy.
Because the blueprint remains. The candles still flicker. And the hands that once gave hope are still here — if we choose to extend them.
This is our moment. Not to mourn what was lost, but to demand what must be restored.
Where To From Here?
Australian aid groups have been highly critical of Donald Trump’s cuts to U.S. foreign aid, describing the impact as devastating for vulnerable communities and for Australian-run programs that relied on U.S. funding.
Jessica McKenzie from ACFID emphasized that the cuts have had ripple effects, especially in the Indo-Pacific region, where Australian agencies lost over $113 million AUD in the Pacific and $111 million AUD in Southeast Asia.
In response, the Australian government has redirected some of its own aid budget to fill the gaps, particularly in the Pacific and Southeast Asia. But aid groups like Safer World for All and ACFID argue that this isn’t enough. They’re calling on the Albanese government to increase Australia’s aid spending to at least 1% of the federal budget, up from its current historic low.
“We urge the US government to immediately resume funding of critical humanitarian and health aid, either through rescinding relevant orders freezing funding or expanding the current narrow humanitarian waiver to cover all necessary health and humanitarian programs.” – Avril Benoît, Chief Executive Officer of Doctors Without Borders {MSF)
**What You Can Do**
1. Share this post to raise awareness.
Call for your church, workplace, school, community group, local council, humanitarian groups, political party, or friendship groups to take action.
2. Contact your local representatives (or other governments) to demand restoration of global aid programs.
Here is a possible email you can adapt – stay polite:
Subject: Restore Global Aid and PEPFAR – Lives Depend on It
Dear [Title] [Last Name],
I am writing to express urgent concern over the recent cuts to foreign aid and PEPFAR programs. These actions have left millions without access to life-saving services and threaten global health infrastructure.
I urge you to:
– Demand the restoration of USAID and PEPFAR funding.
– Call other nations to implement emergency overseas aid to address the shortfall
– Advocate for emergency humanitarian waivers.
– Ensure transparency and accountability in foreign assistance decisions.
Lives are at stake. Please act now.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Country]
3. Support organizations still working on the ground, such as:
Even as government aid collapses, these groups continue to provide life-saving care:
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation (EGPAF)
Focused on ending pediatric HIV/AIDS through prevention, treatment, and advocacy. EGPAF has been deeply affected by U.S. funding cuts in countries like Mozambique.
Partners In Health (PIH)
Strengthens health systems in countries like Haiti, Rwanda, and Sierra Leone. Their community-based model ensures care reaches the most vulnerable.
Amref Health Africa
Africa’s largest health NGO, delivering maternal care, disease prevention, and health worker training across 35 countries.
UNAIDS
Coordinates global efforts to end AIDS as a public health threat. It supports national programs and advocates for equitable access to treatment.
Save the Children
Provides food, education, and health care to children in crisis zones. Their work in refugee camps and famine-stricken areas is critical.
International Rescue Committee (IRC)
Delivers aid in humanitarian emergencies, including health care, food, and education. Active in over 40 countries.
World Vision
Delivers food, clean water, education, and child protection in crisis zones. Their work in refugee camps and famine-stricken areas is critical.
World Vision Australia
Supporting children and communities through long-term development and emergency relief.
World Food Programme (WFP)
The UN’s frontline agency against hunger. WFP supplies emergency food aid in refugee camps and disaster zones, including areas affected by funding cuts.
UNHCR – The UN Refugee Agency
Protects and supports refugees and displaced people worldwide. Their work includes shelter, legal aid, and access to health services.
UNICEF Australia
Helping children survive and thrive through health, education, and protection.
These are not statistics. They are children without medicine, families without food, futures erased by indifference.
As I speak to friends across Africa, mothers tell me their babies are starving because food has been cut in refugee camps. Children lack HIV medicine to keep them healthy and give them a future. Adults weep and beg for help. The world currently ignores their pleas.
It’s time to act.
**Author’s Note**
This post is part of an ongoing effort to document the human cost of political decisions. I write not only as a humanist, but as someone committed to preserving truth and dignity and human life in the face of systemic erasure.
